$70.6 mil in its opening weekend!

Director Catherine Hardwicke and star Kristen Stewart.
I will probably never watch Twilight, as I dislike most teen movies and hate vampires. (If you love bloodsuckers and moral relativity, I recommend Let the Right One In). I feel like I already know what Twilight’s about, and sexual abstinence really isn’t my thing. But if I may put on my garterless second-wave stockings on for a second — and try not to care that Stephanie Meyers’ intensely popular series is far from feminist — I can’t help but celebrate the success of a movie with a female lead (so rare in mainstream movies), a woman director (even rarer), and a woman screenwriter, based on a series by a woman author.
Hopefully, the success of Twilight will pave the way for more female starring roles and directors (Sex and the City doesn’t count).
—
If you’re in the mood for an excellent teen girl movie without crappy special effects, watch Take Care of My Cat, one of the best Korean movies I have ever seen. Starring the lovely Du-na Bae (The Host), TCMC is about the difficulties the friendships between five high school friends suffer a year after graduation. The movie takes place in Inchon, home to a harbor and South Korea’s international airport — an effective metaphor for all the possibilities that mark the incipience of adulthood.
Great Things Come to Those Who Wait Six Years

The second best news of today: Joss Whedon’s new show with ELIZA DUSHKU(!) is picked up for fall January.
The bestest best news of today: The “X-Files” movie is real. There is a release date. And a trailer. And David Duchovny is hot in it. And Gillian Anderson — the hair is too long for Scully’s character but she still makes my heart a-flutter with her almost-husky voice and her sympathy/pity/worry eyes that are for no one else but Mulder. And there be monsters. And some guy who looks an awful lot like Krycek. And an older guy with a scarecrow’s voice and gross long white hair that is somehow perfect for all of this.
There is joy and delight in my heart tonight.
Oscars ‘08
Watching the second half of the Oscars tonight, I kept in mind the New York Times article about Jon Stewart from last week: “[Stewart] said he had to remember that for the people in the first 20 rows of the audience, ‘this is the pinnacle of their careers.’ ‘Their lives could change, and they’re very on edge. So you’ve got to give respect to the fact that this is the most important night in film.’ ”
That last point is usually a fairly difficult one to remember, because usually the kind of people who win are the ones who make or star in stupid shit like A Beautiful Mind and Crash. This year, though, in light of Stewart’s comments above, and probably because I have no idea whether the nominated pictures are any good, the Oscars — which I have not watched in probably ten years — were strangely riveting, especially when the people I totally did not expect to win did, e.g. Marion Cotillard (so pretty!), Tilda Swinton (so scary!), Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová (more on her later), and Diablo Cody. I was particularly fascinated by Cody’s walk upstage, as she clearly did not expect to win and wore a really slutty sheer leopard-print dress with a crotch-length slit in the front seemingly as a fuck-you to Le Academie for not giving her the screenwriting prize. But, caught off-guard by her win, Cody wound up crying and babbling and finally forcing herself off-stage — a poignantly genuine moment in an event devoted to the celebration of fiction and falseness.
I can’t/won’t comment on whether Stewart did a good job, but he did earn an even bigger place in my heart by bringing Markéta Irglová, whose speech was abruptly cut off by her own Best Original Song, back on stage to finish her thanks. Adorable video below and also here.
5 by 5: TV Shows to Watch During the Writers’ Strike
1. America’s Next Dance Crew (MTV). I admit, the bastard child of American Idol and So You Think You Can Dance on the TV channel that is doing more than its share of destroying American culture sounds pretty gosh-darn awful. But the dancers themselves are spectacular, and there’s the added mind-blowing bonus of seeing not just whites’, but Asian Americans’, appropriation of hip-hop culture taken seriously.
2. The Wire (HBO). I am a bit tired of the “The Wire has done what no other television program has come close to achieving—namely, presenting the the life of a decaying American city and doing so with the scope and moral vision of great literature” reviews, so I will just say that after the pinnacle of awesomeness that was the fourth season, there is no way that even The Wire can attain such heights again. Still, after such an amazing last season, how could I not watch the present one?
3. Friday Night Lights (NBC). FNL is undergoing the sophomore slump after the nearly flawless first season, but it’ll be interesting to see what the writers do with the characters and how the narrative arc will unfold, now that Smash has been suspended from the final three games of the season, i.e., there is no way that the Dillon Panthers can go to the state championships, i.e., the writers can’t replicate the first season’s “underdog team goes to state and wins!” storyline. (My personal wishes: Tyra goes to college; Julie shuts up forever.)
4. A Daily Show (Comedy Central). It’s not as funny without the staff writers, but it’s still America’s best news source. And the sight of Jon Stewart not caring about flubbing his lines is pretty charming. (Workers of the world, unite!)
5. Project Runway (Bravo). With last week’s long-overdue elimination of Victoryblah Hongblah, the competition can only get fiercer (sorry, college). Plus next week promises female wrestling outfits!
5 by 5: Korean New Wave

Korean poster of 3-Iron.
Here’s a must-see list of the Korean New Wave since 2000, all available on DVD.
1. The Host (2006). The most popular film in Korean cinematic history is a monster movie with killer SFX that’s as hilarious, poignant, and politically engaging as it is scary. A trio of grown-up misfit siblings — an alcoholic ex-activist, a perennially silver-medaled professional archer, and a mildly mentally handicapped retarded food-stand owner — attempt to rescue the food-stand owner’s daughter from a sea monster that lives in Seoul’s Han River. Think Godzilla meets Little Miss Sunshine.
2. Oldboy (2003). The second installment of Park Chan-wook’s so-called “revenge trilogy” starts with the Kafkaesque imprisonment of a middle-aged man in a 1-bed apartment for ten years. Just as inexplicably as he was imprisoned, he is suddenly released, then taunted by the man who imprisoned him to find and take revenge on him. Violent, absurd, and melodramatic, it’s Tarantino with a heart.
3. 3-Iron (2004). 3-Iron, or “Empty Houses” per the Korean title, is a nearly wordless 1.5-hour vignette by director Kim Ki-Duk, the most talented auteur working in South Korea today. A drifter who wanders through strangers’ empty homes chances upon a battered housewife in her ultra-chic, ultra-alienating mansion. She leaves with the drifter to play (silent) house with him in others’ empty homes, but her husband won’t stop searching for her to drag her back to their (his) house.
4. Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring (2003). Another Kim Ki-Duk masterpiece, Spring takes place on a hut-on-a-raft Buddhist monastery that floats in the center of a lake deep in the forest. A boy-monk, a man-monk, and their pet chicken live in this monastery, their lives governed by the sacred prohibitions against sex, speech, and contact with the outside world (a kind of Buddhism virtually unknown in America). When a girl comes to live with them for a year or so, the now-teenage-monk goes crazy (of course), and it’s bye-bye-Buddhism time (for a while).
5. Peppermint Candy (2000). Possibly the most “Korean” of all the movies on this list, Candy’s first scenes feature a not-young, not-old man on the verge of suicide. The rest of the movie reveals in reverse chronology the series of moral compromises, emasculating humiliations, and occasional personal triumphs he has suffered. Many of these relate to the militarization of Korean society in the 1980s (one deploring scene shows the protagonist as a rookie officer peer-pressured into unlawfully torturing a suspect) and the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s (the protagonist loses his job, and his wife divorces him in response). If Forrest Gump exemplifies American optimism and naivete, Candy stands as a testament to the force of social and institutional fatalism.
FUCKING AMERICAN FUCKING REMAKES!!!!
The Host is the best movie I’ve seen so far this year — fiercely intelligent and satirical, genuinely poignant and entertaining. And one of the things I like most about it is its utter Koreanness; its social satire, ecological concerns, anti-American sentiments, and amazing special effects are all representative of various facets of Korean history, industry, and culture. For example, the opening scene in which an American military scientist pollutes Seoul’s Han River with bio-hazardous waste, which ultimately leads to the monster’s creation, is based on actual 1998 events involving — of course — the American army occupying South Korea. (Consider the mind-blowing arrogance of such an act. I mean, can you imagine the nuclear ass-whoopin’ another country would get if a scientist of that other country’s military dumped bio-hazardous waste into the Potomac River in Washington, D.C., without asking, let alone consulting, the American government?)
Thus it seems inevitable, then, that Hollywood, upon encountering this superlative, genre-bending (not to mention critically fellatioed) film, calls it a day distribution-wise after releasing it in a handful of U.S. theaters, then decides to make a fucking remake that’s going to vacuum from the original everything good and decent about it and reconstruct in its place some shambling barbarity filled with the usual Hollywood regurgitations of lame Hollywood jokes uttered by lame Hollywood actors endowed with too-bright Hollywood teeth and too-fake Hollywood tits — in short, an Armageddon or a Pearl Harbor with a sea monster.
I can’t decide if the American movie-going public is too xenophobic to have another race of people talking in their own language on their multiplex screens (for The Host really is a multiplex movie) or if it just kant reed no good. I suspect a little bit from Column A and a little bit from Column B. Either way, I am going to be in a punching-your-face mood when this remake premieres.
5 by 5: Summer 2007

Still from Persepolis.
Five films I’m looking forward to seeing, in no particular order:
1. Once. The best roads to love are paved with music.
2. My Blueberry Nights. Every Wong Kar-Wai cinescape is chocolate for the eyes.
3. Persepolis. A French adaptation of Marjane Satrapi’s superb graphic novel.
4. Still Life. Still trying to figure out why the critics are creamin’ their pants over Jia Zhangke. Found 2005’s The World kinda meh.
5. Sicko. I’ve been watching a lot of these “The world — it’s terrible!” docs that are flooding the movie market lately.
Paris Hilton vs. The Media
A rebuttal to Christopher Hitchens’ Slate article about the media’s treatment of Paris Hilton:
Hitchens’ article essentially boils down to this sentence: “Those gloating and jeering headlines, showing a tearful child being hauled back to jail, had the effect of making me feel sick.” Neither the media nor its consumers (i.e., everybody) should feel a midgen of glee or satisfaction (as many people clearly did) by the news of the rescindment of Hilton’s house-arrest sentence. (This is clearly unacceptable.)
Let’ s leave aside the question of whether it’s Hilton herself who has invited such mockery and hate through her career as a media whore par excellence for the past few years. First of all, Hilton’s defense — that she did not know that her driver’s license was suspended — is untenable considering her age (26) and the maturity expected of one at that age (in four years she will be THIRTY, for God’s sake). Moreover, she has an entourage of handlers, so it is improbable, if not impossible, that she was unaware of the suspension of her license.
Hitchens’ sympathy for Hilton seems to be founded on the image of a wolfish predator (the press) preying on a hapless and innocent “girl” (used once in the article) and “child” (used twice). However infantile Hilton’s mentality may actually be, Hilton is NOT six or sixteen; she is TWENTY-SIX. Let’s first remember that at age 26, some women raise 8- or 10-year-old children of their own. And secondly, we must take note that it is Hilton’s PR reps and lawyer who are most fervently projecting that image of the little-girl-lost whose lame-ass legal defense entirely consists of declaring, “I didn’t mean to break the law.” (A few weeks ago, Monica Goodling used the same defense with the same pout and crocodile tears to fend off criminal charges for firing eight attorneys from the Justice Department.)
Unfortunately, the flip side of this little-girl-lost image is that of the incompetent girl-woman that we’ve heard about for decades, the one who can’t think or make the right decisions for herself (and therefore whose thoughts and decisions have to be thought and made for her). You know the one, the one shouldn’t vote or attend college or get a job because she, as a member of her gender, just isn’t smart enough. So while Hitchens decries the press’ scarlet lettering of Hilton (again, isn’t this something that Hilton herself invited?), he calls upon that same misogynistic trope of the silly filly instead of accurately describing her as the self-entitled asshole who thought she was above the law.
Update: I ask in complete seriousness, what harm is three weeks going to do to Hilton’s life, anyway? Normally, I am against the penitentiary system as a punishment for legal offenses (as well as California’s awful privatization of its jails), but it’s not like Hilton is going to miss work or school as a result of being in jail. The three weeks will probably do her good in the long term, in fact, since it gets her out of her bubble and will make her a somewhat more responsible citizen, for as jaw-droppingly stupid as she may be, I guarantee you that she won’t be behind the wheel again while her license is still suspended.
Update II: Another Paris-Dubya comparison, this time by Us Weekly editor Janice Min.
Adult Swim

Still from the Venture Bros.
My sentence-fragment judgment of the non-Futurama, non-Family Guy Adult Swim line-up:
Violent and unfunny shows with clever concepts, no soul, and godawful political parody (cf. Venture Brothers, Robot Chicken); reminds you of that really smart kid in high school who you were afraid to talk to because you suspected he spent all his time being quietly evil, i.e., torturing cats and programming e-mail spam.
Spiderman 3: The Near-Perfect Third-Parter

Salon’s Stephanie Zacharek is a much better writer and movie reviewer than I could ever be, so I’m going to let her do the talkin’ for me today. I just want to preface her review (reproduced in part below) by expressing my delight in the none-too-violent end of the alien goo (through the ringing of metal against metal) and in the anti-denouement between Spidey and the Sandman. The anti-revenge mode is one I can definitely jive with.
I also really enjoyed Eddie Brock (Topher Grace) taunting Peter/Spiderman with the franchise’s catchphrases, i.e., “My Spider-Sense is tingling” and “Go get ‘em, Tiger.” That is in-jokes done right.
Here’s Stephanie Zacharek:
How to step into adulthood without being a jerk? That’s just one of the questions [director Sam] Raimi, who co-wrote the script with his brother, Ivan Raimi, and with Alvin Sargent, riffs on here. Spiderman 3 is overloaded with the usual special effects, all but one of which are easily forgotten: There’s simply very little that’s particularly new or exciting about Spidey’s swinging between and around skyscrapers while assorted baddies try to cut him down. And Spiderman 3, like the two pictures that preceded it, suffers from an overall lack of cohesiveness: The picture is entertaining enough as you’re watching it, but afterward, the picture still feels like a bunch of events strung together, more than a rich, fluid whole.
But Spiderman 3 is a vast improvement on the last picture in the franchise — in which the chemistry between M.J. and Peter was barely an afterthought — and it’s a deeper, richer picture than even the first Spiderman. Raimi and his co-writers have taken care to give the relationships between the characters more tangible contours than in the last picture, and the actors give better performances as a result. Dunst has more sparkle here, and Maguire draws some surprising creepiness out of his usual boy-next-door demeanor. Of all the actors here, though, Franco is the one who has improved with each successive picture: As a young man battling his own dark side, he brings smudgy layers of depth to a character that might otherwise be a cartoon. In one sequence, a verbal face-off with Peter, his left eye droops in a sinister, lazy appraisal of his sometime best friend; the moment suggests that Franco might have more to show us than most of his roles have required of him.
Spiderman 3 doesn’t have the operatic dazzle of the first X-Men picture, or the mournfully poetic quality of the often, and inexplicably, maligned Superman Returns. But Raimi at least manages to make it both huge and human. He also pulls off one of the most beautiful special effects I’ve ever seen, in any movie, a testament to the ways in which CGI, used right, can actually humanize a film. After Flint Marko — a criminal who’s done all the wrong things for the right reasons — steps into that whirling particle-physics blender, he’s no longer himself: He’s a mound of sand, a one-man desert, and before our eyes he tries to re-form himself into some semblance of the man he used to be. As he tries to stand, rivers of sand run from his muscles. His contours take shape, fall away, and then stubbornly rebuild themselves: He’s a piece of sculptural poetry, a song of being and becoming, a living, moving Henry Moore statue.
Eventually, a bigger-than-life creature, an anguished giant, emerges from this hill of sand. He’s clutching a locket containing a photo of his little girl, and as he surveys this tiny picture, we know that he’s remembering not just the man he used to be, but the man he failed to be. In this one astonishing scene, Raimi and his special-effects artists give us an image redolent of the great beauty, and the gravity, of silent film. Without a word, they sing the ballad of the disappearing man.
